A Review on Flexible Substrate Materials for Stretchable Electronic Devices

Download PDF
Abstract: Stretchable electronic devices have exerted an overt impact on developments in wearable electronics, biomedical devices, soft robotics and the Internet of Things (IoT), with flexible substrate materials playing a fundamental role as building blocks. This extensive study provides a detailed comparison and contrast of the properties (mechanical, electrical, environmental) of polymer-based, organic compounds, bio-based materials as well as hybrids as substrates for stretchable electronics. Polymer substrates like polydimethylsiloxone (PDMS) and polyurethane have made it possible to obtain stretchability (150%-200%) along with biocompatibility, crucial for making wearable sensors or implants with sensitivity down to 0.5 kPa⁻¹ Biodegradability within 30 days makes organic substrates such as cellulose and silk part of the sustainable materials that derived functional properties, suitable for disposable biosensors. The graphene /silver nanowires hybrid substrates exhibit relatively low sheet resistance (10 Ω/sq) and high transmittance (89%), which is well suited for stretchable circuits and displays. Scalability is further supported by spin-coating, 3D printing, and roll-to-roll processing techniques but uniformity as well as cost remains into question. Key limitations include mechanical fatigue (typically 10,000 cycles), conductivity decrease under flexion, high processing costs ($50–100/kg for organic substrates) and regulatory challenges in the biomedical field. The review focuses on novel trends such as self-healing polymers which recover up to 90% of mechanical properties and bio-inspired substrates for enhanced biocompatibility. Future work, which targets at low-cost and easy scale-up of nanomaterial synthesis, 4D printing for dynamic structures, and integrating with AI/IoT to realize intelligent devices (50 µW/cm²), is also discussed. This work revisits the studies of substrates, as well as actives and passives in other works to present an all-embracing view regarding the substrate materials, applications, and challenges that subsequently helps in paving the way for sustainable scalability of stretchable electronics.
Keywords: Flexible substrates, Stretchable electronics, Wearable devices, Biomedical implants, Soft robotics, Sustainable materials
APA Citation: Haowen Wang (2026). A Review on Flexible Substrate Materials for Stretchable Electronic Devices. International Journal of Materials Science and Technology Studies, 5(4), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijmsts.v5n4.02

References

  1. Hussain, M. M., Ma, Z. J., & Shaikh, S. F. (2018). Flexible and stretchable electronics: Progress, challenges, and prospects. Electrochemical Society Interface, 27(4), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.F08184IF
  2. Nathan, A., et al. (2012). Flexible electronics: The next ubiquitous platform. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special content), 1486–1517. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190168
  3. Sharma, C., Negi, Y. S., & Parida, K. (2023). Biodegradable polymers for wearable electronics and device fabrication. Encyclopedia of Green Materials, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4921-9_195-1
  4. Leogrande, E., et al. (2025). Electronic skin technologies: From hardware building blocks and tactile sensing to control algorithms and applications. Sensors and Actuators Reports, 9, 100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snr.2025.100312
  5. Chen, J., et al. (2018). Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based flexible resistive strain sensors for wearable applications. Applied Sciences, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/app8030345
  6. Dušek, K., Koc, D., Veselý, P., Froš, D., & Géczy, A. (2025). Biodegradable substrates for rigid and flexible circuit boards: A review. Advanced Sustainable Systems, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202400518
  7. He, L., Shi, J., Tian, B., Zhu, H., & Wu, W. (2024). Self-healing materials for flexible and stretchable electronics. Materials Today Physics, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2024.101448
  8. Yun, G., Tang, S. Y., Lu, H., Zhang, S., Dickey, M. D., & Li, W. (2021). Hybrid-filler stretchable conductive composites: From fabrication to application. Small Science, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/smsc.202000080
  9. Wu, H., Huang, Y. A., & Yin, Z. P. (2022). Flexible hybrid electronics: Enabling integration techniques and applications. Science China Technological Sciences, 65(9), 1995–2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2074-8
  10. Wendels, S., & Avérous, L. (2020). Biobased polyurethanes for biomedical applications. Bioactive Materials, 6(4), 1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.002
  11. Maddipatla, D., et al. (2020). A polyimide based force sensor fabricated using additive screen-printing process for flexible electronics. IEEE Access, 8, 207813–207821. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3037703
  12. Mühl, S., & Beyer, B. (2014). Bio-organic electronics—Overview and prospects for the future. Electronics, 3(3), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics3030444
  13. Guchait, A., Saxena, A., Chattopadhyay, S., & Mondal, T. (2025). From trees to tech: The contribution of natural rubber in next-gen flexible electronics. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202506264
  14. Zhao, D., et al. (2024). Flexible sensors based on conductive polymer composites. Sensors, 24(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/s24144664
  15. Kim, J. H., Lee, S. E., & Kim, B. H. (2023). Applications of flexible and stretchable three-dimensional structures for soft electronics. Soft Science, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20517/ss.2023.07
  16. Kang, S. H., Jo, J. W., Kim, J., & Park, S. K. (2024). Stretchable electronics based on inorganic semiconducting materials. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 12(48), 19323–19351. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4tc03745f
  17. Corzo, D., Tostado-Blázquez, G., & Baran, D. (2020). Flexible electronics: Status, challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Electronics, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/felec.2020.594003
  18. Ma, H., et al. (2024). Programmable and flexible wood-based origami electronics. Nature Communications, 15(1), 9272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53708-1